California Department of Fish and Wildlife

Evaluation of the Status of Existing State Game Refuges

Report Completed:

The Department's summary report to the Legislature on the State Game Refuges is now complete and available for downloading here:

The California Legislature has directed the California Department of Fish and Wildlife to review and evaluate the existing State Game Refuge system. A State Game Refuge is an area of land on which hunting is not permitted at any time unless specifically authorized by the Fish and Game Commission.

In 2008, CDFW proposed a legislative change to eliminate the State Game Refuge status of some areas. The proposed change in status would open these lands to public and private use, consistent with adjacent properties, and consistent with other refuges managed by the state and federal government. The Legislature directed the Department to seek public input on this topic.

The following information is provided in accordance with SB 1166 (2008) to inform and educate the public and solicit public comments regarding the State Game Refuges. CDFW must provide a summary of relevant comments and other information provided by the public to the Legislature by January 1, 2011.

Instructions for submitting comments are at the bottom of this page.

California State Game Refuges

Click on any section on the map above to view more detailed maps of the game refuges.

Southern Lake Northeast Bay Coast Inyo Tahoe

A full list of the detailed maps of Game Refuges is listed below.

Background

State Game Refuges were established in the 1910's intending to enhance deer populations in certain parts of California, because of a lack of protections afforded deer from hunting. These small islands of property are "no hunting" areas, although other recreational and commercial land use activities are not restricted and the lands are not managed to benefit wildlife. They are not lands owned or administered by CDFW. CDFW biologists and other experts have acknowledged for the last several decades that the State Game Refuges have been an ineffective tool in achieving deer herd management goals and that modern regulatory mechanisms and protections are adequate.

Other States

In other states, State Game Refuges are typically sites owned and managed by the government of that state. Hunting activities are usually allowed within the refuge perimeter.

However, most State Game Refuges in California are located on privately owned land or on public lands managed by the U.S. Forest Service and are merely "no hunting" zones rather than refuges.

The exceptions are CDFW-owned wildlife areas (such as Gray Lodge and the Grizzly Island Wildlife Area) and Federal Refuges, which are managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Hunting activities are allowed in both types of areas.

Effects of Changing Refuge Status

Removing the legal designation of "State Game Refuge" from these areas will benefit CDFW law enforcement operations and constituents who participate in hunting. The scientific community's knowledge of wildlife ecology and behavior has increased since these refuges were created, and based on this information, CDFW has developed significant regulatory processes to protect and enhance wildlife populations. Elimination of the "State Game Refuge" designation will have no significant impact on the wildlife and ecosystems of these lands. Elimination of any refuges status would increase the amount of private and public land open to hunting in California.

The primary result of eliminating the designation is expected to be an influx of hunters having recreational opportunity in new areas and a change in the general purpose for which CDFW Wardens patrol the areas. A change in status is not expected to impact the necessary levels of law enforcement staffing, time or equipment required to continue enforcing the laws in these areas.

Economic Impact

CDFW does not anticipate any economic impact to the public or to CDFW should any refuge(s) be eliminated.

Legal Impact

The elimination of the "State Game Refuge" designation may ultimately result in the issuance of fewer game law citations, as the current designation is known to cause confusion. Many of these areas currently lack sufficient signage, and are not known to hunters who are hunting in unfamiliar grounds.

California Game Refuges

The State Game Refuges under consideration for a change in status are described in the California Fish and Wildlife Code, sections 10820 to 10842, excluding §10840 (Sea Otter Range). Note the refuges are called "districts" in the statute (e.g., "District 1C" in Modoc County).

To see them on the web, please visit www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/calawquery?codesection=fgc&codebody=10820&hits=20 and click on the first result, "FISH AND GAME CODE SECTION 10820-10844".

If you would like to provide input on the State Game Refuges, you may do so by sending your comments via email to wildlifestrategy@wildlife.ca.gov. Comments must be sent by December 1, 2010 to be summarized in our report to the Legislature. The Department has received over two thousand comment emails, letters, and/or responses to our survey-- thank you.


FAQ's & Additional Information:

Why would the California Department of Fish and Wildlife propose to eliminate a wildlife refuge?

Because they are not wildlife refuges. These State Game Refuges are a refuge in name only. The lands within the somewhat arbitrary boundaries are simply "no hunting" areas while all other land management activities and practices of the landowner are possible whether they benefit wildlife or not. These areas are not managed for wildlife refuge purposes as are federal Fish and Wildlife Service refuges or state Wildlife Areas.

Why were the State Game Refuges established?

The areas were established around the state during the 1910's with the intent to protect deer (primarily) from being overexploited during the period of early regulation and enforcement of game laws. The 1910's were the end of "market hunting" of game species and the beginning of active conservation. It was hoped that deer would reproduce and expand out from these refuges and repopulate other areas where deer were actively hunted. However, in the intervening 100 years or so, deer managers and researchers have learned that deer populations do not behave that way and instead show a high fidelity to traditional winter and summer ranges.

Why does CDFW believe these areas are no longer needed?

The deer populations in California have declined dramatically in the state since the 1960s. This decline was predicted as early as 1932, and certainly was evident during the early 1950s when deer populations were severely exceeding the carrying capacity of their ranges resulting in severe overutilization of their ranges. Additionally, since the establishment of these areas, game laws and regulations have increasingly regulated and protected deer. There is no risk of hunting having a detrimental effect on deer populations, especially because California is largely a "bucks only" hunting system (reasons for that are a story in itself).

In California, increasing acreages of land have been removed as huntable lands in this state since the refuges were established. By default, these have tremendously increased the acreage of unintended "refuge" where hunting is not allowed.

Combined, these factors demonstrate the complete failure of the State Game Refuge system to do as it was intended - to repopulate deer in the state.

Finally, should refuge status be removed, nearly 1,000,000 acres of land could potentially be open to hunting opportunity.

Initially, we would anticipate hunters focusing on these areas and for hunter success to be higher than surrounding areas (where the pressure will be correspondingly less). However, after the first year, the distribution of hunters would balance out consistent with the distribution of the deer population.

Would elimination of these refuges affect other game species?

The areas were largely established to try and restore deer populations. They were not established for bears, wild turkeys, elk, or other species with few exceptions. Existing regulations in place are intended to protect and prevent overharvest of wildife from hunting. If populations of any game species are low, it is typically a result of habitat quantity and quality rather than a result of our regulated hunting.

Other Resources